Read This Now

5:15 p.m. E.T.

Belatedly, here are two Sunday New York Times columns I recommend. I was too busy to process them until now; as busy as you are, make time for them.

Ross Douthat writes about the Republican Party post-Jim DeMint and Maureen Dowd writes about the Republican Party post-Mitt Romney.

Everyone should check them out, but Republican thinkers, activists, strategists, and electeds should pay particular attention to, and ask themselves what they think of, these particular paragraphs:


But if DeMint-style retrenchment was necessary for Republicans, it wasn’t anywhere near sufficient. The conservatism of 2011 and 2012 had a lot to say about the long-term liabilities of the American government but far too little to say about the most immediate anxieties of American citizens, from rising health care costs to stagnating wages to the socioeconomic malaise spreading across the country’s working class. Neither the Reagan legacy nor the current conservative catechism holds the solutions to these problems; they require Republicans to apply their principles more creatively, and think about policy anew.


Who would ever have thought blacks would get out and support the first black president? Who would ever have thought women would shy away from the party of transvaginal probes? Who would ever have thought gays would work against a party that treated them as immoral and subhuman? Who would have ever thought young people would desert a party that ignored science and hectored on social issues? Who would ever have thought Latinos would scorn a party that expected them to finish up their chores and self-deport?

Related Topics: Jim DeMint, Mark Halperin, Maureen Dowd, Mitt Romney, New York Times, Ross Douthat, Sunday Review, Analysis, News, Republican Party, The Page

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Tweets

    View More Tweets From @TIME


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 297 other followers